Homoerotic Archaeology: Advocate Men (March 1998), Part Two

Friday, March 8, 2024

Advocate Men (March 1998), Part Two

Frederick Corey and Thomas Nakayama explain the police officer has a polarized existence in the gay community. On one end of the spectrum, law enforcement is a symbol of oppression due to the decades of police brutality. On the other side of the spectrum, policemen are an eroticized emblem of masculinity. This dichotomy prompts Corey and Nakayama to question what is truly being fetishized: their authoritative presence, their potential for violence, their uniform, their role as an unobtainable sexual partner, or their representation of hypermasculinity. The photo spread in this March 1998 issue of Advocate Men (which has been broken into three parts) attests to all of these factors, from the aggression and uniform to the unattainability and masculinity. Included in this second third (see the first third here) is advice on dealing with AIDS and the dating scene and photo spreads titled “Divine” and “Moving Day.”

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is Homoerotic Archaeology?

In 2016, I discovered several discarded boxes at an estate sale. Under their flimsy flaps were hundreds of well-worn issues of homoerotic magazines from the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. I purchased them out of mild intrigue and, as I perused their pages, I was startled to realize that something commonly disregarded as pornographic smut earnestly chronicled the evolution of gay culture: the social and sexual liberation of the 1970s, the crushing devastation from AIDS during the 1980s, and the gradual strengthening of the community in the 1990s. As a gay man, I was touched by the subtle narrative these publications told. As a historian, I was motivated to digitally preserve their content. And, as an educator, I was driven to create a platform to share that information freely with others interested in the progression of gay society. Homoerotic Archaeology is that venue. Here you will find the advertisements, articles, short stories, and (of course) pictures found in these magazines lovingly preserved and presented for future generations of gay men to enjoy and study.

Why Preserve Homoerotica?

As early as the 1970s, scholars such as June Rook have stressed the need to preserve homosexual history in an effort to combat repression and establish a cultural background for future generations. Much of the preservation process admirably focuses on the substantial works of homosexual artists and thinkers; however, it sadly ignores other elements quintessential to the community’s history, particularly homoerotica. Although frequently labeled obscene filth, homoerotica has, just like the significant creations of artists and thinkers, been a prevalent part of the group’s culture and has played an integral role in shaping identities and perceptions (consider how influential Tom of Finland’s hypermasculinity has been in molding the body ideals of modern gay men). Due to this factor, the conservation of homoerotica is just as essential as the preservation of major artistic and theoretical homosexual works.