Homoerotic Archaeology: Blueboy (May 1980)

Friday, May 16, 2025

Blueboy (May 1980)

This May 1980 issue of Blueboy contains an article on the attempts of Paul Tsongas, a senator from Massachusetts, to amend Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include sexual orientation as one of the qualities protected from employment discrimination. Despite Tsongas’ work, senators Paul Laxalt from Nevada and Larry McDonald from Georgia launched a vehement campaign against the change, killing the effort. To this date, sexual orientation and gender identity do not appear on the list of protected traits, but the 2020 Supreme Court case Bostock v Clayton County did rule that gender identity and sexual orientation were part of sex and could not be used by employers to discriminate against employees. In addition to the article about Tsongas’ amendment, this issue also contains a showcase of men in sportswear.

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is Homoerotic Archaeology?

In 2016, I discovered several discarded boxes at an estate sale. Under their flimsy flaps were hundreds of well-worn issues of homoerotic magazines from the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. I purchased them out of mild intrigue and, as I perused their pages, I was startled to realize that something commonly disregarded as pornographic smut earnestly chronicled the evolution of gay culture: the social and sexual liberation of the 1970s, the crushing devastation from AIDS during the 1980s, and the gradual strengthening of the community in the 1990s. As a gay man, I was touched by the subtle narrative these publications told. As a historian, I was motivated to digitally preserve their content. And, as an educator, I was driven to create a platform to share that information freely with others interested in the progression of gay society. Homoerotic Archaeology is that venue. Here you will find the advertisements, articles, short stories, and (of course) pictures found in these magazines lovingly preserved and presented for future generations of gay men to enjoy and study.

Why Preserve Homoerotica?

As early as the 1970s, scholars such as June Rook have stressed the need to preserve homosexual history in an effort to combat repression and establish a cultural background for future generations. Much of the preservation process admirably focuses on the substantial works of homosexual artists and thinkers; however, it sadly ignores other elements quintessential to the community’s history, particularly homoerotica. Although frequently labeled obscene filth, homoerotica has, just like the significant creations of artists and thinkers, been a prevalent part of the group’s culture and has played an integral role in shaping identities and perceptions (consider how influential Tom of Finland’s hypermasculinity has been in molding the body ideals of modern gay men). Due to this factor, the conservation of homoerotica is just as essential as the preservation of major artistic and theoretical homosexual works.