Homoerotic Archaeology: Inches (October 2000), Part Two

Friday, October 10, 2025

Inches (October 2000), Part Two

The 1950s was a watershed for the gay community. In 1950, the Los Angeles-based Mattachine Society was founded, launching the formation of other groups like ONE, Inc. and the Daughters of Bilitis, the emergence of periodicals such as The Ladder and The Mattachine Review, and the development of the Institute of Homophile Studies. It is this type of forward progress the Studio 2000 film Tailspin attempts to emulate. Set toward the end of the 1950s, the movie follows a set of Eisenhower-era teenagers as they discover their budding sexuality during a time where homosexuals were becoming more vocal and visible. Featured in this October 2000 issue of Inches (which has been broken into three parts) is a photo spread of Jeff White. This second third (see the first third here) features photos of models Chris Dano, Drew Peters, and Victor Racek.

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is Homoerotic Archaeology?

In 2016, I discovered several discarded boxes at an estate sale. Under their flimsy flaps were hundreds of well-worn issues of homoerotic magazines from the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. I purchased them out of mild intrigue and, as I perused their pages, I was startled to realize that something commonly disregarded as pornographic smut earnestly chronicled the evolution of gay culture: the social and sexual liberation of the 1970s, the crushing devastation from AIDS during the 1980s, and the gradual strengthening of the community in the 1990s. As a gay man, I was touched by the subtle narrative these publications told. As a historian, I was motivated to digitally preserve their content. And, as an educator, I was driven to create a platform to share that information freely with others interested in the progression of gay society. Homoerotic Archaeology is that venue. Here you will find the advertisements, articles, short stories, and (of course) pictures found in these magazines lovingly preserved and presented for future generations of gay men to enjoy and study.

Why Preserve Homoerotica?

As early as the 1970s, scholars such as June Rook have stressed the need to preserve homosexual history in an effort to combat repression and establish a cultural background for future generations. Much of the preservation process admirably focuses on the substantial works of homosexual artists and thinkers; however, it sadly ignores other elements quintessential to the community’s history, particularly homoerotica. Although frequently labeled obscene filth, homoerotica has, just like the significant creations of artists and thinkers, been a prevalent part of the group’s culture and has played an integral role in shaping identities and perceptions (consider how influential Tom of Finland’s hypermasculinity has been in molding the body ideals of modern gay men). Due to this factor, the conservation of homoerotica is just as essential as the preservation of major artistic and theoretical homosexual works.