Homoerotic Archaeology: Adam Gay Video (September 1993), Part One

Friday, September 4, 2020

Adam Gay Video (September 1993), Part One

In 1966, William Rotsier launched The Adam Film Quarterly as an additional publication of the Knight Publishing Corporation, which began releasing the magazine Adam in 1956 as a contender to Playboy. Printed monthly, the text offered insights into the pornography business, including interviews with performers and video reviews. Over time, the Knight Publishing Company added other titles to its lineup, with Adam Gay Video being among the last in the late 1980s. Akin to its straight-porn peers, Adam Gay Video featured a survey of the homoerotic industry and competed with similar publications like Manshots. The September 1993 issue (which has been broken into two parts) reflects this, with the first half containing profiles of models Erik Houston and Zak Spears and video stills from The Bite, A Few Fresh Men, and Kiss Off.

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is Homoerotic Archaeology?

In 2016, I discovered several discarded boxes at an estate sale. Under their flimsy flaps were hundreds of well-worn issues of homoerotic magazines from the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. I purchased them out of mild intrigue and, as I perused their pages, I was startled to realize that something commonly disregarded as pornographic smut earnestly chronicled the evolution of gay culture: the social and sexual liberation of the 1970s, the crushing devastation from AIDS during the 1980s, and the gradual strengthening of the community in the 1990s. As a gay man, I was touched by the subtle narrative these publications told. As a historian, I was motivated to digitally preserve their content. And, as an educator, I was driven to create a platform to share that information freely with others interested in the progression of gay society. Homoerotic Archaeology is that venue. Here you will find the advertisements, articles, short stories, and (of course) pictures found in these magazines lovingly preserved and presented for future generations of gay men to enjoy and study.

Why Preserve Homoerotica?

As early as the 1970s, scholars such as June Rook have stressed the need to preserve homosexual history in an effort to combat repression and establish a cultural background for future generations. Much of the preservation process admirably focuses on the substantial works of homosexual artists and thinkers; however, it sadly ignores other elements quintessential to the community’s history, particularly homoerotica. Although frequently labeled obscene filth, homoerotica has, just like the significant creations of artists and thinkers, been a prevalent part of the group’s culture and has played an integral role in shaping identities and perceptions (consider how influential Tom of Finland’s hypermasculinity has been in molding the body ideals of modern gay men). Due to this factor, the conservation of homoerotica is just as essential as the preservation of major artistic and theoretical homosexual works.